Donad Trump asks appeals court to scrap New York probe of his assets

Donald Trump’s lawyer asked a federal appeals court to block New York’s investigation into potentially fraudulent asset valuations at his sprawling real-estate company, extending his legal battle over the three-year-old .

The investigation by Attorney General Letitia James is “harassing and overreaching” and tainted by the Democrat’s political animus toward the former president, Trump’s attorney Alina Habba said in a brief Tuesday with the 2nd Circuit US Court of Appeals.

The appeals case is moving ahead even as longtime Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg could be compelled to testify against the company after agreeing to plead guilty in a related criminal fraud case brought by the Manhattan district attorney.

James’s press office declined to comment on the appelate brief.

Also read: Trump demands release of unredacted affidavit on raid for ‘transparency’

A federal judge in May dismissed Trump’s suit against James, ruling the former president failed to present evidence that the investigation was started as a result of animus. James has argued she started the only after Trump’s longtime lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen testified to Congress that the Trump Organization was “cooking the books,” a claim the company denies.

Habba also claims the lower court misapplied a legal precedent that blocks federal lawsuits from interfering with ongoing related state-court actions.

“We look forward to the Second Circuit’s careful deliberation of the important issues in this case,” Habba said in a statement. “We strongly believe that the lower court both failed to properly apply the law and ignored novel issues unique to this case.”

A state court judge in Manhattan who is overseeing a parallel dispute over New York’s subpoenas has also ruled James’s is valid, saying it “would have been a blatant dereliction of duty” if she hadn’t investigated Trump. A ruling by that judge resulted in Trump, Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump being questioned under oath by James.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Source link

Comments are closed.